Contact Us
5 Essex Court
Temple, London, EC4Y 9AH
Phone: 020 7410 2000
Email: clerks@5essexcourt.co.uk
Practice Areas
Police Law
;Public-Administrative Law
;Personal Injury Law
;Inquests
;Public Inquiries
News
5 Essex Court members appear in Iraq war murder and abuse inquiry
5 Essex Court is rated highly in its specialist fields in Chambers and Partners 2013
5 Essex Court members ranked as "leaders in their field " by Chambers UK for the 2013 edition.
Jeremy Johnson QC represented the successful Respondent UK in Balogun v the United Kingdom.
The Supreme Court assess fundamental questions on public law breach
Congratulations to Chambers' three new QCs
Jeremy Johnson and Lucinda Boon successfully defend the UK in Strasbourg in Seal v UK
Jeremy Johnson QC
YEAR OF CALL 1994
Jeremy is recommended in the major directories:
- “The "phenomenal" Jeremy Johnson QC is "a tireless forensic analyst who has a capacity to turn around paperwork in the shortest of timescales." "Very knowledgeable," he is "a good team player and an excellent tactician" who is "able to undertake cases of any size and complexity." Praised for his advocacy skills, Johnson is also "good at distilling difficult points." He recently appeared on behalf of the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and the Chief Constables of Greater Manchester, West Midlands Police and Lancashire Police in challenges against stop and search legislation. " – (Police Law) Chambers UK 2013
- "Jeremy Johnson QC of 5 Essex Court has successfully defended the government in the higher courts on multiple occasions. In MS (Jamaica), facing an intervention from the UNHCR, he fought off a claim that the State's fast track detention policy was unlawful. Those that have faced him in court are highly complimentary of his abilities." – (Immigration) Chambers UK 2013
- "Jeremy Johnson QC of 5 Essex Court is instructed by the MoD in the Al Sweady inquiry, and is "very well regarded on the public law education and police side." He is "good at distilling difficult points, and is measured in his advocacy." – (Public Law / Inquires) Chambers UK 2013
- “extremely intellectual" Jeremy Johnson QC is the number-one choice of counsel for many in this sector. He is a "good team player and an excellent tactician," who is "able to undertake cases of any size and complexity." Those that instruct him appreciate the fact that he is "very prompt in his turnaround of work." – (Police Law) Chambers UK 2012
- "extremely convincing and compelling advocate," whose court style is "succinct, clear and punchy – he doesn't go on for a minute longer than is necessary, but gets his point across effectively." – (Immigration) Chambers UK 2012
- “an extremely bright public lawyer with an outstanding intellect" – Chambers and Partners 2011
- "one to go to if you have a complicated public law challenge" – Chambers and Partners 2011
- "always on top of the facts and a model of fearless independence" – Chambers and Partners 2011
- ‘fantastic and extremely knowledgeable – a very clever man who always produces a quick turnaround.’ Chambers and Partners 2010
- ‘Outstanding – he works relentlessly, and is incredibly intelligent and incisive.’ Chambers and Partners 2009
- acting for a number of police authorities and local authorities in relation to issues arising out of cuts in public expenditure (including providing legal advice on the implementation of such cuts and defending judicial review proceedings)
- acting for the Ministry of Defence in the Al Sweady public inquiry
- acting for the Home Secretary in a series of cases concerning the detention of foreign national prisoners pending deportation, including current cases in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal
- acting for the Metropolitan Police Commissioner in claims challenging the compatibility of stop and search powers with the European Convention on Human Rights and the compatibility of the retention of DNA samples, custody photographs, crime reports and police intelligence with the European Convention on Human Rights
- acting for the Chief Constable of South Wales in a number of claims relating to the investigations into the murder of Lynette White
- acting for the Crown Prosecution Service in litigation resulting from a murder committed shortly after a decision not to prosecute the assailant for threats to kill
- acting for Gwent and South Wales police in Court of Appeal proceedings concerning the duty of care owed to a person making a 999 call
Jeremy was appointed as a QC in 2011. Before that he was Junior Counsel to the Crown between 2000 and 2011 (A Panel from 2007). He is a member of the Welsh Assembly Panel of Counsel, a Recorder of the Crown Court (2009), editor of the Police Law Reports, and Consultant Editor of Halsbury's Laws Volume 36 (Police). He is Developed Vetted.
Background:
Practises in the areas of public law, human rights (domestic and international) and civil liberties, police and prison law, immigration and asylum, social security, employment and malfeasance claims (assault, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and misfeasance).
Jeremy's current caseload includes:
Police Law:
Jeremy edits the Police Law Reports and Halsbury Laws (Police). He acts for claimants, chief constables, police authorities and the Independent Police Complaints Commission in all cases involving the police, including public law claims, malfeasance cases, employment claims, disciplinary proceedings and Data Protection/Freedom of Information. He regularly provides advice on policy and operational issues, including in relation to counter-terrorism investigations, the use of covert techniques, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, Special Police Services, Data Protection and Freedom of Information.
Recent Police Law cases:
Catt v Association of Chief Police Officers and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, [2012] EWHC 1471 (Admin) Divisional Court
Whether the retention of intelligence relating to the claimant's participation in demonstrations breached Art 8 ECHR.
R (T and R) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, [2012] EWHC 1115 (Admin) Divisional Court
Whether the issue and retention of harassment warning notices breached Art 8 ECHR.
R (Salimi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Independent Police Complaints Commission [2012] EWCA Civ 422 Court of Appeal
Whether the IPCC had jurisdiction to investigate complaints of a failed asylum seeker that he had been assaulted during his removal from the United Kingdom.
R (W) v Chief Constable of Warwickshire, [2012] EWHC 406 (Admin) Administrative Court
Whether the issue of an enhanced criminal record certificate (where an Employment Tribunal had effectively acquitted the claimant of the underlying allegation) breached Art 8 ECHR.
R (Minter) v Chief Constable of Hampshire, [2011] EWHC 1610 (Admin) Divisional Court
Whether the appropriate registration period for a sex offender sentenced to an extended sentence depended on the whole term or just the custodial term.
Williams v Chief Constable of Dyfed Powys Police, [2010] EWCA 1627 Court of Appeal
Whether the issue and execution of a search warrant breached Art 8 ECHR
Seal v United Kingdom [2012] 54 EHRR 6 European Court of Human Rights
Whether the requirement to obtain the leave of the High Court under section 139(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983 before commencing civil proceedings is compatible with articles 6 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
R (F and Thompson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 1 AC 331 Supreme Court
Whether the regime requiring sex offenders to comply with notification obligations for an indefinite period without a right of review was compatible with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
R (Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] 1 AC 345 House of Lords
Whether the Code for Crown Prosecutors was sufficient to satisfy the legality requirement of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in assessing how prosecutorial discretion was likely to be exercised in cases of assisted suicide under the Suicide Act 1961.
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF [2010] 2 AC 269 House of Lords
Whether the system of special advocates in control order proceedings, and the linked disclosure regime, complied with article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
R v G [2009] 1 AC 92 House of Lords
Whether the offence of rape under section 5 Sexual Offences Act 2003 was compatible with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Seal v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2007] 1 WLR 1910 House of Lords
Whether a failure to obtain the leave of the High Court under the Mental Health Act 1983 s.139(2) before commencing civil proceedings rendered those proceedings a nullity.
R (Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire [2007] 2 AC 105 House of Lords
Whether preventing protestors from attending a demonstration had been a breach of article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Ministry of Justice v Scott [2009] EWCA Civ 1215 Court of Appeal
Whether the right to bring an action for malicious prosecution against a complainant was confined to cases in which there was a single prosecution witness with exclusive knowledge of the facts.
Barracks v John Coles and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2007] ICR 60 Court of Appeal
Whether, having regard to section 17 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, the police were entitled to withhold disclosure of documents on the grounds that there was a statutory prohibition on disclosure which the police were not permitted to identify.
R (I) v (1) City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court (2) Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police (Defendants) & Crown Prosecution Service (Interested Party) [2008] EWHC 2146 (Admin) Administrative Court
Whether the power contained in section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000 to detain without warrant was compatible with article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
R (Hodgson) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2008] EWHC 1183 (Admin) Administrative Court
Whether it was lawful to require officers who had served for more than 30 years to retire.
R (Independent Police Complaints Commission) v Assistant Commissioner Hayman [2008] EWHC 2191 (Admin) Administrative Court
Standard of proof in police disciplinary proceedings
R (Independent Police Complaints Commission) v Chief Constable of West Mercia and David Walton [2007] EWHC 1035 (Admin) Administrative Court
Whether it was an abuse of process (double jeopardy) to discipline a police officer on charges which had been determined in the officer’s favour in the context of a coroner’s inquest.
Miller and others v Chief Constable of South Wales Police 2009 High Court
Settlement of major malicious prosecution claim - amount claimed in the region of £3M.
Butterworth v Information Commissioner 2009 Freedom of Information Tribunal
Test case in the Information Tribunal on whether the names of police informants from 100+ years ago should still be kept secret.
Ahmad v Commissioner of Police 2009 High Court
High Court trial of assault claim against a prominent terrorist suspect.
Public / Administrative Law:
Jeremy acts for both claimants and defendants in all areas of public and administrative law, but particularly in relation to claims concerning human rights and civil liberties, criminal law and public protection, immigration and asylum and police/prisons.
Recent Public/Administrative Law cases:
R WL (Congo) and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] 1 AC 245, Supreme Court
Challenge to the Secretary of State's policy for the detention of foreign national prisoners pending deportation. Heard before a panel of 9 Supreme Court Justices in November 2009
R (Naik) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2011] EWCA Civ 1546 Court of Appeal
Whether the exclusion of a high profile Muslim writer and public speaker from the United Kingdom was lawful.
R (F and Thompson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 1 AC 331 Supreme Court
Whether the regime requiring sex offenders to comply with notification obligations for an indefinite period without a right of review was compatible with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Seal v United Kingsom [2012] 54 EHRR 6 European Court of Human Rights
Whether the requirement to obtain the leave of the High Court under section 139(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983 before commencing civil proceedings is compatible with articles 6 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
R (Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] 1 AC 345 House of Lords
Whether the Code for Crown Prosecutors was sufficient to satisfy the legality requirement of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in assessing how prosecutorial discretion was likely to be exercised in cases of assisted suicide under the Suicide Act 1961.
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF [2010] 2 AC 269 House of Lords
Whether the system of special advocates in control order proceedings, and the linked disclosure regime, complied with article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
R v G [2009] 1 AC 92 House of Lords
Whether the offence of rape under section 5 Sexual Offences Act 2003 was compatible with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Seal v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2007] 1 WLR 1910 House of Lords
Whether a failure to obtain the leave of the High Court under the Mental Health Act 1983 s.139(2) before commencing civil proceedings rendered those proceedings a nullity.
R (Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire [2007] 2 AC 105 House of Lords
Whether preventing protestors from attending a demonstration had been a breach of article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
R (Misick) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2009] EWHC 1039 (Admin) Court of Appeal
Whether it was contrary to domestic and international human rights law to suspend democratic institutions in the Turks and Caicos Islands.
R (MK (Iran)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 115 Court of Appeal (and permission application to Supreme Court)
Whether unlawful delay in determining an asylum claim gives rise to a right to damages under EU or ECHR law
R (Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2825 (Admin) High Court
Whether the exclusion of a high profile Muslim writer and public speaker from the United Kingdom was lawful
Timbrell v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] ICR 1369, Court of Appeal
Whether a transgender person who had undergone male to female gender reassignment was entitled to a pension from age 60
R (Bektas) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWHC 2359 (Admin) High Court
Whether the regime for release under section 225A(5) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 was compatible with article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
R (I) v (1) City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court (2) Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police (Defendants) & Crown Prosecution Service (Interested Party) [2008] EWHC 2146 (Admin) High Court
Whether the power contained in section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000 to detain without warrant was compatible with article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Public Inquiries:
Jeremy has acted both for individuals/families and public authorities in several significant public inquiries. He is currently acting for the Ministry of Defence in the Al Sweady public inquiry. He is also acting in a large number of cases where failures to hold public inquiries in relation to allegations of abuse of detainees in Iraq are being challenged
He has acted in a number of significant public inquiries in recent years, including:
The Billy Wright Inquiry (for the Northern Ireland Office, the Northern Ireland Prison Service and a number of senior officials)
The Hutton Inquiry (junior counsel for the Kelly family)
The Inquests into the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed (for the Secret Intelligence Service, the Security Service and Government Communications Headquarters)
The Scott Review (for the Northern Ireland Office, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland and a number of officials)
Lectures:
Jeremy provides CPD lectures to solicitors on all aspects of his practice. Recently he has lectured on the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011, public inquiries, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, false imprisonment and judicial review.
Education:
Inns of Court School of Law, 1993-1994
Common Professional Examination, 1992-1993
Corpus Christi College, Oxford, 1989-1992 (Mathematics and Philosophy)